Skip to content

EasySec Solutions

An Israeli startup building an OT-native zero-trust platform that enforces device-level access control and end-to-end encryption inside industrial and critical-infrastructure networks.

Visit Website ↗ + Add to Compare
42/100Emerging / Unranked

Overview

EasySec Solutions builds a zero-trust security platform purpose-built for operational technology (OT) environments — the industrial control systems, SCADA networks, and connected-device fleets that run critical infrastructure and manufacturing. Rather than adapting IT-centric zero-trust models (which typically stop at network segmentation), EasySec pushes enforcement down to the device level, using endpoint-to-endpoint encryption and access control that operates natively inside OT protocols and hardware constraints.

The company’s flagship offering, ThinGUARD, is a centralized control and monitoring system designed to manage the security posture of large fleets of connected industrial devices from a single console, giving asset owners visibility into device identity, communication paths, and anomalous behavior across plants and sites. The pitch is squarely aimed at sectors where OT downtime is unacceptable and legacy equipment cannot simply be patched or replaced — energy, water, manufacturing, and other critical-infrastructure operators.

Founded in 2017 and based in Jerusalem, EasySec remains a small, self-funded team. That is both the source of its focused OT specialization and a real constraint: the company has not disclosed institutional funding, named enterprise customers, or third-party validation of its platform’s effectiveness. It is a technically credible entrant in a category (OT zero trust) that is drawing increasing attention as ICS-targeted attacks rise, but buyers should weigh its small scale and limited public track record against the differentiated architecture.

Innovation Matrix Assessment

Innovation Velocity 5/10

The company has iterated from a device-security concept to a working centralized platform (ThinGUARD CCMS) covering access control, encryption, and monitoring, but with a team of roughly seven people, public evidence of release cadence or roadmap execution is thin.

Operational Value 3/10

EasySec is unfunded and privately held with a very small team (reported around seven employees) and no disclosed revenue or named enterprise customers, indicating a limited operational footprint for a critical-infrastructure security vendor.

Market Momentum 3/10

No institutional funding rounds, acquisitions, or major partnership announcements were found; visibility appears limited to product listings on industry directories and its own site rather than independent press coverage.

Category Disruption 6/10

Most zero-trust OT offerings graft IT segmentation concepts onto industrial networks; EasySec's device-level, endpoint-to-endpoint enforcement model built specifically for OT protocols and constrained industrial hardware is a genuinely different architectural approach to a hard problem.

Real-World Efficacy 3/10

No named customer deployments, independent lab evaluations, or third-party OT security assessments of the platform were found; effectiveness claims currently rest entirely on vendor product descriptions.

Enduring Relevance 5/10

OT/ICS attack surface is a top-tier concern for critical infrastructure operators right now, which makes the category highly relevant, but a seven-person unfunded vendor carries real vendor-viability risk that large infrastructure buyers must weigh against the technical fit.

Why CISOs Should Care

For CISOs responsible for OT/ICS environments where patching and network redesign are impractical, EasySec offers a way to add device-level access control and encryption without re-architecting existing industrial networks.

What Makes It Different

Enforcement happens at the device level inside the OT network itself, rather than relying on perimeter segmentation or IT-style network zero trust bolted onto industrial protocols.

The Matrix Verdict

42/100 — EMERGING / UNRANKED

A technically differentiated OT zero-trust architecture from a very small, self-funded team with no independently verified deployments yet — worth tracking as the OT security category matures, but not yet proven at scale.

Editorial Note: Claims vs. Verified Findings

All performance, deployment, and effectiveness claims about ThinGUARD originate from EasySec's own materials and secondary vendor-directory listings; no independently verified customer names, incident outcomes, or third-party test results were found during research.

Sources