Skip to content

DynaRisk

London-based cyber risk scoring and dark web monitoring platform built for insurers underwriting and monitoring cyber policies.

Visit Website ↗ + Add to Compare
45/100Emerging / Unranked

Overview

DynaRisk builds cyber risk scoring and dark web monitoring technology aimed primarily at the insurance sector, giving insurers and brokers a way to quantify a prospective or existing policyholder’s cyber risk exposure — compromised credentials, exposed assets, employee risk behavior — before underwriting a cyber policy, and to monitor that risk through the life of the policy.

Founded in 2016 by Andrew Martin, a former banking cybersecurity specialist, and headquartered in London, DynaRisk has raised roughly $13-15M across multiple rounds, including a $4.7M raise in July 2025 led by YFM Equity Partners specifically to expand its cyber risk infrastructure for global insurance markets. The insurance-sector focus is a meaningful specialization versus generic breach-monitoring tools aimed at consumers or SMBs directly.

DynaRisk’s core value proposition rests on risk-scoring accuracy that is difficult to verify independently without access to its underlying methodology or a third-party validation study; the company’s own claims about breach detection coverage and scoring precision have not been corroborated by named insurer results in public sources found during this research.

Innovation Matrix Assessment

Innovation Velocity 5/10

A 2025 funding round earmarked specifically for expanding cyber risk infrastructure suggests active platform development, though no specific new feature releases were independently verifiable.

Operational Value 4/10

Provides functional risk scoring and dark web monitoring capability aimed at a specific insurance workflow, but evidence of the platform running at scale across a large insurer's book of business was not found.

Market Momentum 5/10

Multiple funding rounds since 2016, most recently $4.7M in July 2025 specifically to expand into global insurance markets, show continued investor confidence and a growth trajectory, though the company remains small relative to major cyber risk-quantification vendors.

Category Disruption 4/10

Applying breach/dark-web risk scoring specifically to insurance underwriting is a useful vertical specialization, but risk-scoring-for-cyber-insurance is now a populated category rather than a novel approach.

Real-World Efficacy 3/10

No independently verifiable evidence — named insurer results, third-party accuracy validation, or a published methodology audit — was found to confirm the scoring model's real-world predictive accuracy; scored conservatively given this gap.

Enduring Relevance 6/10

Cyber insurers have a clear, growing need for better risk quantification at underwriting time, and a purpose-built vendor addressing that specific workflow is directly relevant to that buyer, even though evidence of efficacy is limited.

Why CISOs Should Care

Most directly relevant to insurance-side risk and underwriting teams rather than enterprise CISOs, though CISOs negotiating cyber insurance may encounter DynaRisk-scored assessments of their own organization.

What Makes It Different

Vertical focus on insurance underwriting and policy-life monitoring, rather than being a generic consumer or SMB breach-monitoring tool.

The Matrix Verdict

45/100 — EMERGING / UNRANKED

A credible, funded niche player in cyber risk quantification for insurance, but its scoring efficacy is not independently verifiable from public sources, which caps confidence in its editorial score.

Editorial Note: Claims vs. Verified Findings

Claims about risk-scoring accuracy and breach-detection coverage are vendor-sourced and were not independently corroborated by named insurer case studies or third-party validation in this research. The funding rounds, investor names, and founding details are independently verifiable through funding databases and press coverage.

Sources