Skip to content

Strike

Latin America-founded continuous penetration testing platform combining AI-driven attack simulation with a network of ethical hackers.

Visit Website ↗ + Add to Compare Claim This Company
60/100Incremental Innovator

Overview

Strike (formerly Strike Security) was founded in 2021 by Santiago Rosenblatt, a security researcher who began hacking as a child and later led security at the Latin American delivery platform PedidosYa. The company runs a continuous, ‘augmented pentesting’ platform — branded Strike360 — that tests web apps, APIs, mobile apps, cloud infrastructure, and internal networks on an ongoing basis rather than through the traditional one-time annual pentest engagement, combining automated AI-driven attack simulation with human ethical hackers for validation and remediation guidance.

Strike raised a $5.4 million seed round led by Greyhound Capital aimed at bringing perpetual pentesting to small and mid-sized businesses, followed by a $13.5 million Series A in March 2025 to expand its AI-powered continuous testing and automated retesting capabilities into the U.S. and Brazilian markets.

The continuous-pentesting-as-a-service model Strike operates in has become increasingly common as point-in-time annual pentests are seen as insufficient against continuously shipping software; Strike’s differentiation rests on execution and AI-assisted attack simulation speed rather than a wholly new testing category.

Innovation Matrix Assessment

Innovation Velocity 6/10

Two funding rounds and expansion from a small-business pentesting tool into an AI-powered continuous-testing platform spanning web, API, mobile, and cloud surfaces in under four years shows solid execution pace.

Operational Value 7/10

Continuous testing with automated retesting gives security teams ongoing visibility into newly introduced vulnerabilities as code ships, rather than a stale annual snapshot.

Market Momentum 6/10

A $13.5 million Series A with U.S. and Brazil market expansion is real, independently reported growth, though still modest next to established pentesting-as-a-service incumbents.

Category Disruption 5/10

Continuous, AI-assisted pentesting is a genuine improvement over point-in-time annual testing, but the model itself (crowdsourced or platform-based continuous testing) is now a well-established category with multiple competitors.

Real-World Efficacy 6/10

The company's AI-driven attack simulation and automated retesting claims are plausible given its funding and growth, though independent, named-incident evidence of vulnerabilities caught that caused real breaches elsewhere is not publicly documented.

Enduring Relevance 6/10

As software release cycles keep shortening, continuous rather than point-in-time testing will likely remain the more relevant model, keeping this space durable.

Why CISOs Should Care

Replaces the stale, once-a-year pentest snapshot with continuous, AI-assisted testing and automated retesting, giving security teams ongoing assurance as applications and infrastructure change.

What Makes It Different

Pairs AI-driven attack simulation with a human ethical-hacker network under one platform (Strike360), rather than offering either a pure automated scanner or a pure bug-bounty marketplace.

The Matrix Verdict

60/100 — INCREMENTAL INNOVATOR

An Incremental Innovator: Strike executes well on a now-established continuous-pentesting model with real funding and market expansion behind it, but the underlying category is increasingly competitive rather than novel.

Editorial Note: Claims vs. Verified Findings

Funding rounds and market-expansion plans are independently reported by SiliconANGLE and SecurityWeek; specific claims about AI attack-simulation effectiveness are the company's own.

Sources