Skip to content

Zeroport

Israeli startup replacing IP-based remote access with a patented non-IP hardware bridge, aiming to eliminate the VPN and gateway attack vector for OT and critical infrastructure.

Visit Website ↗ + Add to Compare
67/100Incremental Innovator

Overview

Zeroport is an Israeli cybersecurity startup founded in mid-2024 by CEO Joseph Gertz and CTO Lavi Friedman, both alumni of IDF Unit 81, alongside COO Rotem Kalmi. The company takes a hardware-first approach to secure remote access, arguing that the software-defined perimeter model underlying VPNs, bastion hosts, and even most zero trust network access (ZTNA) products still routes an IP packet across the trust boundary, leaving a path malware and attackers can exploit. Zeroport’s Fantom platform instead builds a physical, non-IP bridge at the network edge: inbound traffic is restricted to human interaction signals (keyboard/mouse), and outbound traffic is limited to display-only pixel streams, so no routable packet ever physically crosses into the protected environment.

The product line spans Fantom Core (single isolated-session units), Fantom Edge and Enterprise (appliances supporting hundreds of concurrent isolated sessions), and Moativ, an onboard AI monitor that watches session behavior frame-by-frame and terminates sessions that drift from their sanctioned intent. The company targets sectors where remote access to sensitive or air-gapped systems is both essential and high-risk: energy and utilities, industrial/OT environments, banking and finance, government, and other critical infrastructure operators who have historically had to choose between staying offline or exposing systems through conventional remote-access software.

Zeroport closed a $10 million seed round led by lool Ventures, with participation from Clarim Ventures, CyberFuture (backed by Elron Ventures), and Fusion Fund. The company operates out of Herzliya, Israel, with additional offices in New York and Singapore, and has grown to roughly 25 employees with plans to reach about 40 within a year of the raise. Public market validation is still early-stage: the company cites endorsement from Siemens Energy and adoption interest from Fortune 500 CISOs, along with a systems-integrator case claiming $5 million in annual travel-cost savings from remote-first field access, but these are vendor-supplied claims that CISOs should independently verify during evaluation.

For security leaders evaluating remote access to OT, ICS, and other high-consequence environments, Zeroport represents a genuinely different architectural bet: physics-based isolation rather than policy-based access control. That approach sidesteps an entire class of VPN and gateway CVEs that have driven major incidents (including nation-state intrusions via edge VPN appliances), but it is also new enough that longevity, interoperability at scale, and independent security testing of the hardware itself remain open questions for buyers to press on.

Innovation Matrix Assessment

Innovation Velocity 7/10

Founded mid-2024 and already shipping a three-tier hardware product line (Fantom Core/Edge/Enterprise) plus an AI session-monitoring add-on (Moativ), with a $10M seed closed and headcount growth from roughly 25 toward 40 within the first year, and expansion to New York and Singapore offices alongside the Herzliya HQ.

Operational Value 5/10

Still an early-stage operation: single funding round, ~25 employees, and a small number of publicly named reference points (Siemens Energy endorsement, one unnamed systems integrator case study). Go-to-market and support infrastructure for OT/critical-infrastructure customers at scale is unproven.

Market Momentum 6/10

The $10M seed drew coverage across Israeli tech and security trade press with a notable investor syndicate (lool Ventures, Clarim Ventures, CyberFuture/Elron, Fusion Fund). Vendor-cited adoption interest from Fortune 500 CISOs and a Siemens Energy endorsement suggest early enterprise pull, though independent, named customer deployments are not yet publicly documented in volume.

Category Disruption 8/10

Genuinely novel architecture: rather than layering more policy and authentication onto an IP-based tunnel (the VPN/ZTNA model), Zeroport removes the routable IP path entirely via purpose-built hardware, restricting the boundary to human-input signals in and pixel-stream video out. This physics-based approach to remote access isolation is a meaningfully different bet than the software-defined perimeter approaches dominating the category.

Real-World Efficacy 6/10

The threat model Zeroport addresses is well evidenced industry-wide -- VPN and remote-access gateway compromise is a documented top vector in ransomware and nation-state intrusions, including into OT/critical infrastructure. Zeroport's specific claims of eliminating that vector are plausible given the hardware design, but efficacy evidence to date is vendor-supplied (case studies, customer quotes) rather than independent red-team or third-party security testing of the appliances themselves.

Enduring Relevance 8/10

Secure remote access into OT, ICS, and other high-consequence environments is one of the most active current attack surfaces, with edge VPN and gateway CVEs driving multiple major 2023-2025 incidents. Critical infrastructure operators facing this exact tradeoff (stay offline vs. expose via legacy remote access) are a large and urgent buyer population.

Why CISOs Should Care

CISOs responsible for OT, ICS, or other air-gap-adjacent environments who are tired of VPN and gateway CVEs driving incident response should evaluate Zeroport as an alternative to software-defined remote access -- particularly where the operational cost of an intrusion (safety, uptime, physical consequences) justifies investing in purpose-built isolation hardware rather than another layer of policy on top of IP connectivity.

What Makes It Different

Most remote-access security vendors (ZTNA, PAM, bastion/jump-host products) reduce risk by tightening policy and identity checks around an IP connection that still ultimately exists. Zeroport instead removes the IP connection across the trust boundary altogether, using patented hardware to physically limit what can cross: human input in, pixel video out, with no routable packet path either direction.

The Matrix Verdict

67/100 — INCREMENTAL INNOVATOR

An early but well-funded and architecturally distinctive entrant in secure remote access. Zeroport is worth a pilot for OT/critical-infrastructure buyers specifically frustrated with VPN/gateway CVEs, but as a sub-two-year-old company with one funding round and thin independent validation, it should be evaluated as an emerging bet rather than a proven standard.

Editorial Note: Claims vs. Verified Findings

The $10M seed amount, investor list, founder backgrounds, HQ location, and employee counts were cross-verified across two independent sources (Calcalist/CTech and Enterprise Security Tech) and were consistent. Customer-impact claims (Siemens Energy endorsement, Fortune 500 CISO adoption, $5M annual travel savings cited by an unnamed systems integrator) are vendor-supplied via the company's own website and press materials and have not been independently corroborated; treat as vendor claims pending further verification.

Sources